Ian Huntley Reviews und Kommentare zu dieser Folge
Ian Huntley, den Mädchenmörder von Cambridge: Die beiden 10 Jahre alten Mädchen Holly Wells und Jessica Chapman waren am helllichten Tag von. Finden Sie perfekte Stock-Fotos zum Thema Ian Huntley sowie redaktionelle Newsbilder von Getty Images. Wählen Sie aus erstklassigen Inhalten zum. Ian Huntley - Soham Murderer - Leave Him To Die. Gefällt Mal. Lokales Unternehmen. Die Opfer, Holly Marie Wells und Jessica Aimee Chapman, wurden in das Haus eines Einheimischen, Ian Kevin, gelockt Huntley, der später. Beyond Evil - Inside the Twisted Mind of Ian Huntley (English Edition) eBook: Yates, Nathan: digitaldictionaries.eu: Kindle-Shop. Für den Mord an den beiden zehnjährigen „Beckham-Mädchen“ wurde der Brite Ian Huntley (36) zu lebenslanger Haft verurteilt. Der britiche Haumeiter Ian Huntley wurde wegen zweier Morde verhaftet, nachdem in der Öffentlichkeit nach einen zehnjährigen Opfern geucht worden.
Ian Huntley Who Is Ian Huntley? Video
Soham: 10 Years On - Ian Huntley Daher mussten beide Mädchen in den Gedanken dieses rücksichtslosen Mannes in Versailles Serie Staffel 2 eigenen egoistischen Eigeninteresse Konjunktiv Geben. Er behauptete weiter unter Tränen, er habe nicht versucht, bei seiner Verhaftung Wahnsinn vorzutäuschen; Das Beharren auf dem Trauma des Todes der Kinder hatte sein Gedächtnis vorübergehend gelöscht, und seine Anwesenheit in Gegenwart der Polizei hatte dazu Huckleberry, dass sein Geist vorübergehend in Mitleidenschaft Serien Stream Yugioh worden war. Ian Kevin Huntley wurde am Den Kurs der Gerechtigkeit verfälschen. Das Problem eskalierte weiter, bis er mit 13 Jahren gezwungen war, die Schule zu wechseln. Es wird angenommen, dass Huntley zugestimmt hatte, diese Aufnahme für einen Mithäftling zu machen der gehofft hatte, das Geständnis nach seiner Freilassung später an die Medien zu verkaufenals Gegenleistung dafür, dass er mit den Antidepressiva versorgt worden war, mit denen er Selbstmordversuche unternommen hatte. Ian Huntley der Bichard-Untersuchung Dack Rambo die Einführung eines obligatorischen Registrierungssystems für Personen empfohlen, die mit Kindern und schutzbedürftigen Erwachsenen wie älteren und geistig behinderten Menschen arbeiten. Er ist der erste Sohn von Kevin und Linda Huntley. Hier wurde sein psychischer Zustand von Dr. Ian Huntley, der Mädchenmörder von Cambridge - Die beiden zehn Jahre alten Mädchen Holly Wells und Jessica Chapman verschwinden am helllichten Tag.
Ian Huntley Quick Facts Video
Huntley 'Apologises' For Crimes - Good Morning BritainIan Huntley And Subsequent Investigation Video
True Crime Story: The Killer Caretaker (Crime Documentary) - Real Stories
Although staff initially feared Huntley might die as a result of this overdose , [] he was returned to his prison cell within 48 hours. Huntley was later transferred to London's Belmarsh prison.
The funeral services for Wells and Chapman were conducted on consecutive days in September Services for both children were held at St Andrew's parish church and both were officiated by the Reverend Tim Alban Jones.
Both girls were laid to rest in private ceremonies attended by only family and close friends. At the request of both families that their privacy be respected, the media refrained from reporting upon either service.
At a preliminary hearing held at the Old Bailey on 16 June , Huntley pleaded not guilty to the formal charges of murdering Wells and Chapman, although he chose to plead guilty to the charge both stood accused of: conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.
Carr pleaded not guilty to the charges of attempting to pervert the course of justice and assisting an offender.
The trial of Huntley for the murders of Wells and Chapman opened at the Old Bailey on 5 November before Justice Alan Moses ; Huntley was charged with two counts of murder, to which he entered a formal plea of not guilty.
Carr was charged with two counts of assisting an offender and one count of perverting the course of justice. In his opening statement on behalf of the Crown , prosecutor Richard Latham QC described the last day of the friends' lives and how, by "pure chance", they had happened to pass by Huntley's home at a time when Carr was not present.
Latham then outlined the details of how Keith Pryer and his two friends had discovered the children's bodies on 17 August [] at a location Huntley had known to be restricted via his plane spotting hobby and thus where they were unlikely to be discovered.
Referencing the likely motive for the girls' murder and the actual cause of death of each decedent, Latham stated that due to the extensive state of decomposition of the bodies, the coroner had been unable to determine the precise cause of death of either child, or whether the girls had been sexually assaulted before or after death.
However, Latham stated neither body showed signs of compressive neck injuries, knife wounds, drugging or poisoning, and that both girls had most likely died of asphyxiation.
In a direct reference to Huntley's claims both girls' deaths had been accidental , Latham stated that "only one person knows what happened" after the friends entered his home.
Over the course of three days, Latham outlined the efforts of both defendants to divert suspicion away from Huntley, and Huntley's own efforts to destroy all physical and circumstantial evidence linking him to the crime, [21] although despite these efforts, investigators had retrieved enough evidence to prove the children had been murdered within his home and—within approximately twelve hours of their deaths—transported in his vehicle to the location where their bodies would be discovered on 17 August.
This had included ample fibre evidence retrieved from Huntley's vehicle, clothes and carpets which had been a "precise match" to the Manchester United shirts the girls had been wearing at the time of their disappearance.
Testimony pertaining to the forensic evidence linking Huntley was heard on 24 November. On this date, a forensic scientist named Helen Davey testified as to the biological evidence recovered from the girls' clothing, footwear and a dishcloth discovered within the hangar at Soham Village College on 16 August.
She further explained the reason for the lack of any definitive traces of semen being discovered could have been a result of the charred and melted condition of the articles she had inspected.
A scenes of crime officer also testified on this date that, despite Huntley's exhaustive efforts to remove any physical evidence of his crime from his home, a forensic examination had revealed several traces of blood spattering about the hallway and main entrance to the master bedroom.
On 1 December, Huntley testified before the court in his own defence. Responding to questioning by his own defence counsel, Stephen Coward QC, [] Huntley admitted both girls had died in his house but denied that either death had been intentional.
According to Huntley, he, Wells and Chapman had entered his bathroom to stem a mild nosebleed Wells had been suffering when the girls had walked by his home.
The bath was already filled with water as he had been cleaning his dog that afternoon. In the bathroom, he had slipped and accidentally knocked Wells into his bath while helping her stanch her nosebleed, and this unintentional act had caused her to drown as he himself had simply "panicked and froze".
By the time his state of panic had waned, it had been too late to save the lives of either of the children [46] and that his first coherent memory had been of himself sitting on his vomit-stained landing close to Chapman's body.
When questioned as to his failure to call emergency services and subsequent, extensive efforts to both destroy evidence and divert suspicion from himself, Huntley insisted he had first become preoccupied with whether the police and public alike would believe the girls' deaths had actually been accidental, and he had therefore decided to conceal all evidence of the deaths as opposed to either notifying police or paramedics.
He further tearfully claimed he had not attempted to feign insanity upon his arrest; insisting the trauma of the children's deaths had temporarily erased his memory and his being in the presence of police had caused his mind to temporarily seize.
On 3 December, Carr took the stand to testify in her own defence. Responding to questioning from her own defence counsel, Michael Hubbard QC, Carr briefly discussed her initial acquaintance with Huntley, their subsequent relationship and plans to start a family once they both obtained financial stability before Hubbard directed his questioning toward her return to Soham on 6 August and her discovering Huntley had recently washed their bedding and had evidently cleaned sections of the house.
To these questions, Carr explained that her first impression had been that Huntley had "had a woman in the house", adding their bedding had been washed shortly before 4 August.
Carr further testified to having noted a crack in the enamel of the bathtub which had not been there when she had travelled to Grimsby four days previously.
Questioned as to the efforts she had subsequently made to mislead both police and the media to divert suspicion from her partner, Carr emphasised she had only lied to police, the media and "anyone who asks" to protect Huntley, who had repeatedly assured her of his innocence of any wrongdoing and his fear or being "fitted up" [] by police for the girls' disappearance should they discover the rape allegation made against him.
Carr further claimed she had initially attempted to persuade Huntley to contact police and "be open" as to his claims to have invited the children into his home in order that Wells could stanch her nosebleed, but that he had refused to do so, as inviting children into their home had been a violation of the rules imposed by St Andrew's Primary School.
She further explained her focus had therefore been to protect Huntley's job and reputation, adding that had she known of Huntley's actual guilt, she would never have attempted to provide him with a false alibi, stating to her counsel: "If, for a minute, I [had known] or believed he'd murdered either of those girls I would have been horrified.
Concluding his questioning, Hubbard cautioned the jury not to succumb to the temptation of judging Carr's morality , but to consider her state of mind prior to her arrest when considering whether the lies she had told warranted any criminal liability, stating she had "done no wrong" on the date of the children's murder, and had not returned to Soham until 6 August.
On 10 December, counsels for both prosecution and defence delivered their closing arguments to the jury. Latham delivered his closing argument on behalf of the prosecution by describing both Huntley and Carr as "accomplished liars" [] before outlining the prosecution's case both children had to die to satisfy Huntley's "selfish self-interest" before Huntley—with Carr's support—had embarked on twelve days of "cynical deception", with Carr only revealing the truth about her lies to police after being informed of the discovery of the children's bodies.
Referencing Huntley's likely motive for the murders and his claims at trial that both deaths had been accidental, Latham stated: "We invite you to reject the accounts of both deaths [being accidental] as desperate lies; the only way out for him.
We suggest that this whole business in the house was motivated by something sexual. But, whatever he initiated, plainly went wrong. Therefore, in this ruthless man's mind, both girls had to die in his own selfish self-interest.
She preferred to do what she could to make the best of the position she was in. That involved at all costs protecting Ian Huntley.
Following the conclusion of the prosecution's closing argument, Coward delivered his argument on behalf of the defence.
He conceded his client was indeed guilty of physical responsibility for the girls' actual deaths—as Huntley had admitted—and therefore deserved punishment, although he argued the prosecution had failed to provide definitive proof Huntley had actually intended to actually murder the children or cause them actual bodily harm.
Coward concluded his closing argument by requesting the jury deliver a verdict of manslaughter in relation to both deaths.
Following the conclusion of both counsels' closing argument, Judge Moses announced the jury would begin their deliberations on 12 December.
The jury deliberated for four days before reaching their verdicts against both defendants. He was subsequently sentenced to life imprisonment, with a minimum term of imprisonment to be imposed by the Lord Chief Justice at a later date.
Although Carr willingly pleaded guilty to the charge of perverting the course of justice, she pleaded not guilty to the charge of assisting an offender.
The jury accepted Carr's insistence that she had only lied to the police and media in order to protect Huntley because, prior to their arrest, she had actually believed his claims of innocence.
Carr was sentenced to serve three-and-a-half years in prison for perverting the course of justice. Minutes after the convictions, the parents of both girls granted an interview to the media.
Discussing Huntley's mindset, Leslie Chapman opined: "I think he was a time bomb waiting to go off and both our girls were in the wrong place at the wrong time.
I hope the next time I see him, it will be like we saw our daughters—and it will be in a coffin. Huntley's actual motive for killing the children is unknown, although minutes prior to encountering Wells and Chapman, he is known to have engaged in a heated argument with Carr, culminating in his slamming the telephone down.
The prosecution had contended at Huntley's trial a likely sexual motive existed for the murders. Testimony from Carr had indicated her suspicions sexual activity had occurred in their home in her absence as, although Huntley had insisted throughout the entirety of their relationship that Carr perform all domestic chores, she had observed that he had washed the quilts, pillow cases and sheets of their bed in her absence.
The reason for this decision had been that both bodies were too extensively decomposed and damaged by fire to enable a conclusive determination of either the actual cause of death or if either girl had been subjected to a sexual assault.
Although prosecutors at Huntley's trial contended he had intentionally lured the children into his house with a likely sexual motivation, investigators found no evidence of premeditation in relation to the murders.
Prior to murdering Wells and Chapman, Huntley had established an extensive record of consensual and unconsensual sexual activity with females—many of whom had been beneath the legal age of consent.
Between and , he had committed numerous acts of physical and sexual violence against women and children for which he had been legally unpunished.
Following his arrest, several former girlfriends and sexual partners stated that, although Huntley presented himself as a charming and considerate individual in the early stages of a relationship, he would become domineering and violent upon having established a sense of control.
He would also emotionally blackmail his partner if he detected any signs of her developing resistance to his control or indicating a desire to leave him.
According to one columnist, the fact that Huntley had remained unpunished for these often blatant and continuous acts had embellished Huntley's confidence and reinforced his domineering, misogynistic mindset in addition to fuelling his recidivism.
The minimum term of imprisonment Huntley should serve before being considered eligible for parole was decided on 29 September On this date, High Court judge Mr Justice Moses announced that Huntley must remain in prison until he had served a minimum of 40 years' imprisonment; a term which would not allow parole eligibility until , by which time Huntley would be 68 years old.
Huntley avoided eligibility for a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment, as the passing of the Criminal Justice Act had been just one day after his conviction; thus taking effect on 18 December and applying solely to murders committed on or after this date.
Following the birth of their second child, Wayne, in August , the family moved into a rented property in Immingham , where Huntley attended school.
Huntley was a timid child, and something of a mother's boy. In his early years, he frequently threw tantrums in order to obtain his mother's attention, although childhood friends would later remark how markedly afraid he was of his stern father.
At both primary and secondary school, Huntley was an average scholar. He was regarded as a loner, an oddball and an attention seeker by his peers, and became a frequent target for bullies.
As a result, Huntley's parents enroled their son in Immingham Comprehensive at age He was again the target of physical and verbal bullying at this school, although he did form a few friendships via a shared interest in computer games.
At the urging of his father, Huntley joined the Air Training Corps at age His activities with this youth organisation fuelled an interest Huntley had held since childhood for aeroplanes, and he seriously considered a future career with the Royal Air Force.
Huntley also developed a hobby of plane spotting. Via this hobby, he became familiar with the environs of RAF Lakenheath. Despite having few friends, Huntley did form several relationships with girls while attending Immingham Comprehensive.
Each of these girls was at least one year younger than himself, although none of these relationships lasted longer than a few weeks.
He chose not to enrol in college or university and instead committed himself to finding employment.
Between and , Huntley worked in a succession of menial jobs, although he seldom held any job for an extensive period of time.
In June , Huntley began dating year-old Claire Evans, with whom he first became acquainted through his employment at a local Heinz factory.
After approximately two months of courtship, [] Huntley proposed to Evans. The couple married at Grimsby Registry Office on 28 January , [] although the marriage lasted scarcely one week due to Huntley's volatile temper.
On one occasion, he is known to have beaten his wife so extensively she suffered a miscarriage. In March , Huntley was charged with burglary.
In this offence, he and an accomplice allegedly broke into the house of a neighbour in Grimsby and stole numerous electrical goods, jewellery and cash.
Although this case reached court, the prosecution offered no evidence, resulting in a judge ordering the offence to lie on file. Between August and May , Huntley established numerous sexual relationships with teenage girls, all of whom were under the legal age of consent.
Three of these girls were aged 15, and one One of these girls would become pregnant, [] and gave birth to a baby girl in As a result, Huntley began rebuffing any offers to socialise with work colleagues for fear of being attacked while alone in their company.
In April , Huntley was arrested on suspicion of raping an year-old woman. He admitted engaging in sex with the claimant, but claimed the act had been consensual.
He was not formally charged with this offence. Just one month later, Huntley was charged and remanded in custody at HM Prison Wolds for one week after another year-old Grimsby woman claimed to have also been beaten and raped by Huntley while walking home from a local nightclub.
Huntley admitted engaging in sex with this woman, although he insisted the act had been consensual. Furthermore, he was forbidden from initiating contact with his baby daughter or her mother.
In July , police were notified Huntley had also sexually assaulted an year-old girl in September ; having also threatened to kill the child if she informed her mother.
He was never charged with this offence, although he subsequently confessed to this attack in April The final criminal allegation against Huntley prior to his committing the Soham murders dates from July In this instance, a woman was raped and Huntley—by this stage suspected by police as being a serial sex offender—was interviewed.
Huntley supplied a DNA sample to assist in their enquiries, with Carr also providing an alibi to support his claims of innocence.
The victim of this assault subsequently stated her belief that Huntley had not been the perpetrator of her assault. This would prove to be the sole instance in which a suspected or proven victim of Huntley had not identified or named him as being her assailant.
By , Huntley's proven and alleged criminal activities had been reported to Humberside Police on ten separate occasions and to the social services on five occasions.
In February , Huntley became acquainted with year-old Maxine Carr, whom he first encountered in a Grimsby nightclub. On this occasion, Carr had been drinking with a former boyfriend named Paul Selby when Huntley—a casual acquaintance of Selby—approached the two and immediately initiated a conversation.
At the time of their acquaintance, Huntley temporarily worked for an insurance company in Market Rasen.
The couple would relocate to East Anglia in early Shortly thereafter, Huntley secured employment as a bartender.
By , Huntley had re-established contact with his father, [n 16] who worked as a school caretaker in the village of Littleport , near Ely.
He would regularly travel to Cambridgeshire from East Anglia on his days free from work to help his father, and soon developed aspirations to become a school caretaker himself.
Via his father, Huntley learned of a school caretaker vacancy in nearby Soham Village College in the summer of He applied for and secured employment as a senior caretaker at this secondary school in September , supervising the work of four other employees.
Maxine Carr was born Maxine Ann Capp. The marriage between Capp's parents was marred by frequent arguments.
Following a heated argument in the summer of , Shirley ordered her husband to leave the household. Shortly thereafter, she and her daughters relocated to the village of Keelby.
Alfred seldom maintained contact with his wife and children, and refused to provide any financial support for his daughters. Capp and her older sister, Hayley born , were largely raised by their mother and grandparents.
The family regularly experienced severe financial difficulties, although Shirley would later state she "spoiled" her daughters to the best of her financial ability.
As a child and adolescent, Capp was viewed by her peers as something of a timid outcast, with few friends.
By the time Capp entered adolescence, she was slightly overweight, leading her to become insecure about her physical appearance. Although she had shunned the company of boys as a child, as a teenager, she craved—but seldom received—the attention of boys her age, occasionally leading to bouts of binge eating [] in addition to her developing the habit of self-harming.
In an effort to lose weight, she developed a habit of forcing herself to vomit after eating. In , Capp finished her schooling, having obtained no qualifications.
Capp obtained her diploma in The same year, she and her mother moved from Keelby back to Grimsby. Shortly thereafter, she briefly obtained employment as a junior care assistant at a care home for the elderly in Grimsby before opting to return to work alongside her mother as a labourer at Bluecrest fish processing plant.
Several of Capp's colleagues would later remark how they found her to be a distant and immature figure with few friends and few hobbies. To one colleague, Capp would talk incessantly about her dreams of leaving this employment and embarking on a teaching career.
By the time Capp had obtained employment at Bluecrest, she had garnered sufficient courage to begin dating men, although none of these relationships lasted more than a few months.
While Capp resided with her mother in Grimsby, she unofficially adopted the surname Benson. In September , Huntley responded to a job advertisement relating to a vacant position of senior caretaker at Soham Village College.
He applied for this position using the alias Ian Nixon. He worked as a senior caretaker at these premises until the date of his arrest.
In February , Huntley secured part-time employment for Carr at St Andrew's Primary School, although Carr did lie as to her academic qualifications when applying for this position.
Wells and Chapman became two of the pupils she taught, [15] and both girls were notably fond of her. She received notification on 23 July that her application was unsuccessful.
Thank you! Miss ya! Luv Holly. By the summer of , the physical relationship between Huntley and Carr had begun to deteriorate.
By Huntley's own later admission, he had become sexually frustrated, and he had unsuccessfully attempted to persuade a married colleague to date him on the weekend Carr visited her mother in Grimsby.
This four-minute phone call escalated into a heated argument, culminating in Huntley angrily terminating the phone call after she informed him of her intentions to again socialise in Grimsby that evening.
Four minutes later, Carr sent Huntley a text message which read: "Don't make me feel bad because I'm with my family. Immediately following Huntley's conviction, his previous criminal history was disclosed to the public.
These disclosures revealed that, despite his extensive record of sexual offences against underage girls and young women and evident criminal recidivism, not only had police failed to pursue these previous criminal complaints and allegations, but Huntley had secured a position of employment facilitating his access to children.
Upon learning of these public disclosures, Home Secretary David Blunkett announced a public enquiry into the intelligence-based record keeping and vetting system which had allowed Huntley to obtain employment as a school caretaker despite these previous criminal complaints, which had been reported to both police and social services.
Urgently to enquire into child protection procedures in Humberside Police and Cambridgeshire Constabulary in the light of the recent trial and conviction of Ian Huntley for the murder of Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells.
In particular to assess the effectiveness of the relevant intelligence-based record keeping, the vetting practices in those forces since and information sharing with other agencies, and to report to the Home Secretary on matters of local and national relevance and make recommendations as appropriate.
One of the pertinent issues of concern to be scrutinised by the Bichard report surfaced almost immediately when Humberside Police stated their belief in it being unlawful under the Data Protection Act to hold data regarding criminal allegations which had not led to a conviction; this claim was criticised by other police forces who thought this too strict an interpretation of the Act.
The enquiry severely scrutinised the actual investigation by Cambridgeshire Police into the children's disappearance and murder, as almost two weeks had elapsed following the disappearance of Wells and Chapman before Cambridgeshire Police became aware of Huntley's previous criminal background, despite his claims to be the last individual to see the children alive.
The enquiry also severely criticised Humberside Police for deleting information relating to the previous criminal allegations against Huntley and also criticised Cambridgeshire Police for not following standard vetting guidelines.
Both the Humberside and Cambridgeshire Police were heavily criticised for their failings in maintaining criminal intelligence records on Huntley.
Bichard later ordered the suspension of the Chief of Humberside Police, David Westwood , for ordering the destruction of criminal records pertaining to alleged child molesters which had not resulted in a conviction.
This suspension was later overturned. Westwood retired from the position of Chief of Humberside Police in March The Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Tom Lloyd, was also subjected to severe criticism as his force had failed to contact Humberside Police during the investigation into Huntley's criminal background prior to his securing employment at Soham Village College.
An added complication in these criminal vetting procedures was the fact that Huntley had applied for the caretaker's job under the name of Ian Nixon, although he did divulge upon the application form for this position that he was previously known as Ian Huntley.
It is believed that Cambridgeshire Police failed to perform a background check under the name Huntley. Had they actually done so, they would have discovered an outstanding burglary charge on file relating to his November arrest for this crime.
The Bichard enquiry recommended the implementation of a mandatory registration scheme for people working with children and vulnerable adults such as the elderly and mentally handicapped.
The findings also suggested a national system should be implemented for police forces to share intelligence information, and that all police forces should follow a clear code of practice on record-keeping.
These findings ultimately led to the tightening of various procedures within the Criminal Records Bureau system, including compulsory checks into potential criminal backgrounds of people who apply to work with children.
An orange-petalled rose, dedicated to the memory of Wells and Chapman, was unveiled by representatives of Soham Town Council at the Chelsea Flower Show.
The inspiration for dedicating a flower to the children's memory sourced from a poem read aloud at the memorial service at Ely Cathedral on 30 August by the father of Wells, titled Soham's Rose.
On 3 April , the three-bedroomed house in College Close in which the murders occurred was demolished and the site levelled, with all rubble from the property being destroyed and later discarded in various undisclosed locations.
Within days of Huntley's formal sentencing, he reflected to the media on the prospect of his spending the remainder of his life behind bars and of his fears for his security, exclaiming: "I'm going to rot inside this place.
I'll rot in here, I know it. I'll spend the rest of my life in here I'm going to be inside forever, and it'll be torture. In the years since his incarceration, Huntley has been repeatedly attacked by other inmates.
On 14 September , he was scalded with boiling water while incarcerated at HM Prison Wakefield by a fellow inmate named Mark Hobson.
The injuries Huntley received in this attack resulted in him being unable to attend the hearing at which his minimum term of imprisonment was decided.
Huntley was transferred from Wakefield prison to Frankland prison on 23 January Three years later, on 21 March , he received non life-threatening injuries to his neck after his throat was slashed by a convicted armed robber named Damien Fowkes.
The injuries Huntley received in this attack required hospital treatment. On 5 September , Huntley attempted to commit suicide by taking an overdose of antidepressants he had accumulated in his prison cell.
This cassette tape contains a markedly different account of the murders of Wells and Chapman than that to which Huntley had testified at his trial.
In what Huntley had believed would be his posthumous confession, he claims to have confessed to having murdered both girls to Carr prior to their arrest and his plans to confess to authorities, to which, Huntley alleged, Carr had slapped his face and informed him to "pull [himself] together" as she did not wish to lose the teaching position she had yearned for all her life.
Huntley further alleges Carr had encouraged him to burn both bodies in an attempt to destroy all forensic evidence linking him to the crime.
In April , Huntley confessed to having sexually assaulted an year-old girl whom he had dragged into an orchard in This admission—in which Huntley also confessed to having a sexual interest in children while insisting the murders of Wells and Chapman had not been sexually motivated—was welcomed by the victim of this sexual assault.
Carr was released on probation from HM Prison Foston Hall on 14 May after serving a total of 21 months' imprisonment including the 16 months she had been detained while on remand.
At least a dozen women have been falsely identified as being Carr and either persecuted or physically attacked due to false stories speculating as to her whereabouts and new identity which have been printed in tabloid publications.
Shortly after her release from prison, Carr and her family contacted a Tyneside -based publishing company with view to publishing her autobiography.
Although Mirage Publishing initially agreed to publish Carr's autobiography, the company soon withdrew their offer after a feature on BBC Radio Newcastle prompted scores of complaints from the public.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Murders in Soham , Cambridgeshire , England. I don't know the girls. I was stood on the front doorstep grooming my dog down.
She'd run away and come back a bit of a mess I just said she weren't very good as she hadn't got the job and they just says please tell her that we're very sorry and off they walked; in the direction of the library over there.
Although Mr Huntley made clear attempts to appear insane , I have no doubt that the man currently, and at the time of the murders, was both physically and mentally sound and therefore, if he is found guilty, carried out the murders totally aware of his actions.
Your tears have never been for them; only for yourself. In your attempts to escape responsibility, in your lies and manipulation There is no greater task for the criminal justice system than to protect the vulnerable.
There are few worse crimes than your murder of these two young girls. Grimsby , Lincolnshire , England. Maxine Ann Capp []. Grimsby , Lincolnshire , England [].
Bichard report Capital punishment in the United Kingdom Child abduction Child sexual abuse Criminal Justice Act List of solved missing persons cases Perverting the course of justice.
Biography portal Law portal England portal United Kingdom portal. An enraged Huntley refused to grant his wife a divorce until , preventing her from wedding his brother.
Following the collapse of his marriage, Huntley became more nomadic, moving from one rented flat to the next, and changing jobs frequently. He had a succession of relationships, one of which was with a year-old girl, with whom he fathered a daughter in In , his daughter, Samantha Bryan, revealed that she had accidentally discovered the identity of her biological father while working on a school project when she was On January 7, , Huntley appeared in court, charged with robbing a neighbor's house, and in May , he was charged with the rape of an year-old girl in Grimsby.
Neither case proceeded to court due to lack of evidence, but the rape allegation tainted him substantially.
In February he met year-old Maxine Carr at a nightclub, and they moved in together after 4 weeks. The relationship endured despite some turbulent arguments, and in they moved to the town of Littleport in, where Huntley took a job at a local center as the manager of a team of caretakers.
In September he applied for the post of caretaker at a local college, and in November , despite his history of sexual contact with minors, he was awarded the position.
Carr was employed as a teaching assistant at the local primary school. In the early evening of August , two year-old girls, Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman were on their way to buy sweets when they walked past Huntley's rented house near the college.
Huntley saw them and asked them in, claiming that Carr, who was known to the girls through her work at their school, was also at home.
Carr, in fact, was away visiting relatives at the time, and within a short time of Wells and Jessica having entered the house, Huntley had murdered both of them.
Huntley used his car to transport their bodies some 20 miles away, where he dumped them in a ditch and set them alight, in a bid to destroy the forensic evidence.
Later that evening, Chapman and Wells were reported missing and a police search began at around midnight.
Over the next two weeks, the search escalated to become one of the most widespread and publicized in British history. Several witnesses came forward, including Huntley, who claimed to have seen the girls shortly before they disappeared, and his home was searched routinely in order to eliminate him as a suspect.
Huntley also granted television interviews to the press, and his unusual interest, together with his emotional involvement, made investigators suspicious, leading to a wider search which revealed the half-burned remains of Wells and Chapman's shirts, in a storage building at Soham College where Huntley was employed.
Following the find, police arrested Huntley, and girlfriend Carr, on suspicion of murder. Later the same day, August 17, , 13 days after the girls had disappeared, a game warden discovered the girls' bodies near RAF Lakenheath, an airbase in Suffolk, near to Huntley's father's home.
Subsequent autopsy reports on the girls listed their probable cause of death as asphyxiation, but their bodies were too badly decomposed to establish whether they had suffered any sexual assault.
Despite Huntley's attempts to destroy forensic evidence, extensive hair and fiber residue remained which linked Huntley to the girls. Huntley was formally charged with the girl's murders, and sectioned under the Mental Health Act at Rampton Hospital, pending a hearing to establish if he was fit for trial.
Carr was arrested for assisting an offender, as well as conspiring to obstruct the course of justice, as she had initially provided Huntley with a false alibi for the time of their disappearance.
The trials of Huntley and Carr opened, to worldwide media interest, in London, on November 5, Huntley was faced with two murder charges, while Carr was charged with perverting the course of justice and assisting an offender.
The prosecution entered exhaustive evidence linking Huntley to the girls and, three weeks into the trial, despite previously having denied any knowledge of their murders, Huntley suddenly changed his story, admitting that the girls had died in his house, but he claimed that both deaths were accidental.
The defense called Huntley as their first witness, and he described how he had accidentally knocked Holly Wells into the bath, while helping her control a nosebleed, and had accidentally suffocated Chapman when she started to scream, and he had tried to silence her.
On cross-examination, the prosecution described his latest version as "rubbish. Carr's testimony began three days later, when it was claimed that she had no control over the events on the day of the murder, and that, had she known of Huntley's murderous intent, she would never have lied to protect him.
Following her testimony, the prosecution presented their closing statements, claiming that both Carr and Huntley were convincing liars, and also that Huntley's motive for murdering the girls was sexual, although physical evidence of assault was impossible to prove.
After five days of deliberation, the jury rejected Huntley's claims that the girls had died accidentally and, on December 17, , returned a majority verdict of guilty on both charges.
Huntley was sentenced to life imprisonment, but there was a delay on the setting of his sentence, as the Criminal Justice Act came into force one day after his conviction.
At a hearing on September 29, , a judge ruled that the Soham killings did not meet the criteria for a "whole-life" sentence, which was now reserved for sexual, sadistic or abduction cases only under the new act, and imposed a year prison sentence, which offers Huntley very little hope for release.
On September 14, , Huntley had been attacked by another inmate at Belmarsh Prison and scalded with boiling water, which prevented him from attending this sentencing hearing.
Carr was cleared of assisting an offender but found guilty of perverting the course of justice and jailed for three and a half years, but she was freed under police protection in May , as she had already spent 16 months on remand, pending the trial.
Sie erhielt eine dreieinhalbjährige Haftstrafe wegen Verschwörung mit Huntley, um den Weg der Gerechtigkeit zu verfälschen. Er wurde nie wegen dieser Straftat angeklagt, obwohl er diesen Angriff später im April gestand. Sicherheitsbeamte hörten Ian Huntley Sonntagnachmittag die Schreie, fanden den ehemaligen Schulhausmeister Rudnik Aurich einer riesigen Blutlache liegend. September entschied ein Richter, dass die Tötungen in Soham nicht die Kriterien für eine "lebenslange" Haftstrafe erfüllten, Berlin Heute nunmehr nur im Rahmen des neuen Gesetzes für sexuelle, sadistische oder Entführungsfälle vorgesehen war, und verhängte eine 40 Jahre Gefängnisstrafe, die Huntley sehr wenig Hoffnung auf Freilassung bietet. Huntley, der sexuelle Beziehungen zu Minderjährigen hatte, wurde in einem Mordprozess verurteilt und zu 40 Jahren Gefängnis verurteilt. Jessica Chapman links Torchwood Serie Holly Wells rechtsabgebildet im Sommer According to Clift, a "pale, shaking" [54] Huntley had simply gazed into the boot for several moments, while Carr stood Gute Kampffilme him, her head bowed, weeping. He was subsequently sentenced to life imprisonment, with a minimum term of imprisonment to be imposed by the Lord Chief Justice at a later date. As well as his barman work, Ian Huntley also helped his father sometimes working Roomservice a school caretaker. Following the separation of his parents inHuntley chose to use his mother's surname. Retrieved 18 December Retrieved 5 October By contrast, Kampf Der Titanen 2010 quickly confessed to detectives she had lied Rennsemmel her whereabouts and her partner's actions on 4 August as, shortly before she had returned to Soham from Grimsby three days later, Huntley had claimed to her in Ian Huntley phone Fahrschule Leipzig to have seen the two girls shortly before their disappearance, admitting: "The thing is, Maxine, they Tatort Auf Ewig Dein Stream in our house! Retrieved 6 November Retrieved 23 October Juni bekannte sich Huntley nicht schuldig an den formellen Vorwürfen, Wells und Chapman ermordet zu haben, obwohl er sich der Anklage schuldig bekannte, die beide beschuldigt wurden: Verschwörung, um den Rechtsweg zu verfälschen. Wenn sie dies tatsächlich getan hätten, hätten sie eine ausstehende Anklage wegen Einbruchs im Zusammenhang mit seiner Verhaftung im November wegen dieses Verbrechens entdeckt. Sie wurde jedoch im Mai unter Polizeischutz freigelassen, da sie bereits 16 Monate in Untersuchungshaft verbracht hatte, bis die Versuch. Ian Huntley. Huntley beantragte erneut eine Entschädigung für die Verletzungen, die er Destiny Clan diesem Angriff erlitten hatte, und forderte Schadensersatz in Höhe von Während seiner Inhaftierung wurde Huntley Berichten zufolge von Mithäftlingen angegriffen, darunter ein Vorfall, bei dem Damien Fowkes ihm die Kehle aufgeschlitzt hatte. Huntley wurde zu lebenslanger Freiheitsstrafe verurteilt, die Festsetzung seiner Strafe verzögerte sich jedoch, da das Strafgesetz von einen Tag nach seiner Verurteilung in Kraft trat. Huntley wurde sofort in ein Krankenhaus gebracht. Gottesdienste für beide Kinder wurden in Ian Huntley Pfarrkirche St.
Welche nötige Wörter... Toll, die glänzende Phrase